Built for evidence teams that need speed and traceability

Manage systematic reviews like a high-precision workflow.

EvidUP brings imports, duplicate review, title and abstract screening, full-text decisions, conflicts, PRISMA progress, and extraction into one polished workspace for collaborative review teams.

Cleaner

duplicate gates

Faster

screening loops

Ready

for AI guidance

Interactive workflow demo

Move a review from import to extraction

Click the stages or run the fake screening loop. The preview shows how EvidUP gates duplicates, captures decisions, and prepares extraction.

Workflow

36%

waiting

3

reviewers

2

conflict

1

Title & abstract

Run a fast reviewer decision loop

Click Include, Maybe, or Exclude to preview the directional decision motion used in EvidUP.

3 waiting
#184Journal of Evidence Synthesis2026

Digital triage strategies for systematic review title and abstract screening

A collaborative review team evaluates screening workflows, duplicate gates, and reviewer agreement across imported citation records.

Keyword match: screening workflow

Workflow

A guided path from citations to extracted evidence.

Content now appears progressively as you scroll, using lightweight reveal motion while keeping the layout stable and readable.

011,248 records

Import cleanly

Bring RIS, NBIB, BibTeX, CSV, and pasted references into one organized review workspace.

02216 removed

Resolve duplicates

Hold unresolved duplicate pairs before screening so reviewers work from a cleaner queue.

0342% screened

Screen with context

Review titles and abstracts with notes, keyword highlights, undo, conflicts, and transparent history.

0489 pending

Move to evidence

Push included studies into full-text decisions, exclusion reasons, PRISMA tracking, and extraction.

Platform

Built for real review teams, not just pretty dashboards.

EvidUP focuses on the messy parts of systematic reviews: reviewer queues, unresolved duplicates, maybe decisions, exclusion reasons, audit trails, and handoffs into extraction.

Duplicate gates before screening

Unresolved duplicate suggestions are held back from the screening queue until the team decides what to keep.

Reviewer-first decisions

Fast cards, keyboard shortcuts, notes, required full-text reasons, and reversible decisions keep screening controlled.

AI-ready project criteria

Inclusion and exclusion criteria are saved at the project level so future AI suggestions can use structured guidance.

Trust

Transparent by default.

Every screen should make the next action obvious and every review decision traceable. The interface can feel dynamic while the scientific workflow stays controlled.

Trace every reviewer decision

Keep conflicts visible

Prepare PRISMA-style progress

Use criteria consistently

Ready when your team is

Start clean, screen faster, and keep every decision accountable.

Create account →