Digital triage strategies for systematic review title and abstract screening
A collaborative review team evaluates screening workflows, duplicate gates, and reviewer agreement across imported citation records.
EvidUP brings imports, duplicate review, title and abstract screening, full-text decisions, conflicts, PRISMA progress, and extraction into one polished workspace for collaborative review teams.
Cleaner
duplicate gates
Faster
screening loops
Ready
for AI guidance
Interactive workflow demo
Click the stages or run the fake screening loop. The preview shows how EvidUP gates duplicates, captures decisions, and prepares extraction.
Workflow
36%
waiting
3
reviewers
2
conflict
1
Title & abstract
Click Include, Maybe, or Exclude to preview the directional decision motion used in EvidUP.
A collaborative review team evaluates screening workflows, duplicate gates, and reviewer agreement across imported citation records.
Workflow
Content now appears progressively as you scroll, using lightweight reveal motion while keeping the layout stable and readable.
Bring RIS, NBIB, BibTeX, CSV, and pasted references into one organized review workspace.
Hold unresolved duplicate pairs before screening so reviewers work from a cleaner queue.
Review titles and abstracts with notes, keyword highlights, undo, conflicts, and transparent history.
Push included studies into full-text decisions, exclusion reasons, PRISMA tracking, and extraction.
Platform
EvidUP focuses on the messy parts of systematic reviews: reviewer queues, unresolved duplicates, maybe decisions, exclusion reasons, audit trails, and handoffs into extraction.
Unresolved duplicate suggestions are held back from the screening queue until the team decides what to keep.
Fast cards, keyboard shortcuts, notes, required full-text reasons, and reversible decisions keep screening controlled.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria are saved at the project level so future AI suggestions can use structured guidance.
Trust
Every screen should make the next action obvious and every review decision traceable. The interface can feel dynamic while the scientific workflow stays controlled.
Trace every reviewer decision
Keep conflicts visible
Prepare PRISMA-style progress
Use criteria consistently
Ready when your team is